qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] qtest/ide-test: ppc64be correction for ATAPI te


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] qtest/ide-test: ppc64be correction for ATAPI tests
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:55:19 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Am 28.09.2015 um 19:38 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> the 16bit ide data register is LE by definition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/ide-test.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/ide-test.c b/tests/ide-test.c
> index 5594738..b6e9e1a 100644
> --- a/tests/ide-test.c
> +++ b/tests/ide-test.c
> @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static void send_scsi_cdb_read10(uint64_t lba, int 
> nblocks)
>  
>      /* Send Packet */
>      for (i = 0; i < sizeof(Read10CDB)/2; i++) {
> -        outw(IDE_BASE + reg_data, ((uint16_t *)&pkt)[i]);
> +        outw(IDE_BASE + reg_data, cpu_to_le16(((uint16_t *)&pkt)[i]));
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void cdrom_pio_impl(int nblocks)
>          size_t offset = i * (limit / 2);
>          size_t rem = (rxsize / 2) - offset;
>          for (j = 0; j < MIN((limit / 2), rem); j++) {
> -            rx[offset + j] = inw(IDE_BASE + reg_data);
> +            rx[offset + j] = le16_to_cpu(inw(IDE_BASE + reg_data));
>          }
>          ide_wait_intr(IDE_PRIMARY_IRQ);
>      }

Why doesn't the access in test_identify() need a fix?

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]