qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] qcow2: Fix potential qemu-img check crash on 32


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] qcow2: Fix potential qemu-img check crash on 32 bit hosts
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:25:38 +0200

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:23:45PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> This crash was caught with qemu-iotests test case 138.
> 
> Commit b6d36de already fixed a few 32 bit truncation bugs that could
> cause qemu-img check to allocate too little memory and consequently
> it would segfault. On 32 bit hosts, there is one more place that needs
> to be fixed because size_t was involved in the calculation and is a
> 32 bit type there.
> 
> Cc: address@hidden
> Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
Tested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/qcow2-refcount.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
> index 6e0e5bd..820f412 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ fail:
>  /* refcount checking functions */
>  
>  
> -static size_t refcount_array_byte_size(BDRVQcow2State *s, uint64_t entries)
> +static uint64_t refcount_array_byte_size(BDRVQcow2State *s, uint64_t entries)
>  {
>      /* This assertion holds because there is no way we can address more than
>       * 2^(64 - 9) clusters at once (with cluster size 512 = 2^9, and because
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]