qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:57:04 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Am 14.06.2016 um 18:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
> On 06/14/2016 10:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 14.06.2016 um 10:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
> >>>> #4  0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, 
> >>>> req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208, 
> >>>>     bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
> >>>> #5  0x00007fa81c669ecb in bdrv_co_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, offset=8, 
> >>>> bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0, 
> >>>>     flags=(BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ | BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE | 
> >>>> BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP | BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING | BDRV_REQ_FUA | unknown: 
> >>>> 4278124256), address@hidden(unknown: 0))
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1492
> >>>
> >>> That 'flags' value looks bogus...
> >>>
> >>>> #6  0x00007fa81c65e367 in blk_co_pwritev (blk=0x7fa81d4c5b60, 
> >>>> offset=30878208, bytes=256, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0, 
> >>>>     flags=(unknown: 0)) at 
> >>>> /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:788
> >>>> #7  0x00007fa81c65e49b in blk_aio_write_entry (opaque=0x7fa7e849aca0)
> >>>>     at 
> >>>> /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:977
> >>>> #8  0x00007fa81c6c823a in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, 
> >>>> i1=<optimized out>)
> >>>>     at 
> >>>> /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/util/coroutine-ucontext.c:78
> >>>> #9  0x00007fa818ea8f00 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> >>>
> >>> and we don't get anything further in the backtrace beyond coroutines, to
> >>> see who's sending the bad parameters.  I recently debugged a bogus flags
> >>> in bdrv_aio_preadv, by hoisting an assert to occur before coroutines are
> >>> used in blk_aio_prwv():
> >>>
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg02948.html
> >>>
> >>> I've just posted v2 of that patch (now a 2/2 series), but in v2 no
> >>> longer kept the assert at that point.  But maybe the correct fix, and/or
> >>> the hack for catching the bug prior to coroutines, will help you debug
> >>> where the bad arguments are coming from.
> >>
> >> That does not fix the assert.
> >>  
> >>>> #10 0x00007fa80d5189d0 in ?? ()
> >>>> #11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>>> (gdb) up 4
> >>>> #4  0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, 
> >>>> req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208, 
> >>>>     bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
> >>>> 1243         assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
> >>>> (gdb) p *qiov 
> >>>> $1 = {iov = 0x7fa81da671d0, niov = 1, nalloc = 1, size = 256}
> >>
> >> So, it seems that the issue is coming from the fact that bdrv_co_pwritev()
> >> does not handle alignments less than BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE :
> >>
> >>    /* TODO Lift BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE restriction in BlockDriver interface */
> >>    uint64_t align = MAX(BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, bs->request_alignment);
> >>
> >> It calls bdrv_aligned_pwritev() which does the assert : 
> >>
> >>    assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
> > 
> > Yes, but between these two places, there is code that should actually
> > enforce the right alignment:
> > 
> >     if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
> >         ...
> >     }
> > 
> > You can see in your backtrace that bdrv_aligned_pwritev() gets a
> > different qiov than bdrv_co_pwritev() (which is local_qiov in the latter
> > function).
> > 
> > It's just unclear to me why this code extended bytes, but didn't add the
> > tail_buf iovec to local_qiov.
> 
> The gdb backtrace is bogus. It does not make sense. May be a gdb issue
> with multithread on jessie.
> 
> In the path tracking the tail bytes, we have : 
> 
>      if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
>       ...
          if (!use_local_qiov) {
              qemu_iovec_init(&local_qiov, qiov->niov + 1);
              qemu_iovec_concat(&local_qiov, qiov, 0, qiov->size);
              use_local_qiov = true;
          }
>         tail_bytes = (offset + bytes) & (align - 1);
>         qemu_iovec_add(&local_qiov, tail_buf + tail_bytes, align - 
> tail_bytes);
> 
>         bytes = ROUND_UP(bytes, align);
>     }
> 
> This is where the issue is I think. The qiov holds 256 and bytes 512.
> 
> I have no idea how to fix that though.

Added some more context above. qiov->size as passed from the device is
already 256 bytes, which are added to local_qiov with
qemu_iovec_concat(). And then we add another 256 from tail_buf in the
lines that you quoted, so in theory we should end up with a properly
aligned 256 + 256 = 512 byte qiov.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]