qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of


From: Wouter Verhelst
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:03:46 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:05:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> There are more clients than the Linux and qemu ones, but I think it's
> fair to say that those two are the most important ones. If they agree
> that a read reply which errors should come without payload, then I think
> we should update the standard to say that, too.

I've just pushed a commit that changes the spec (and the implementation)
so that if a server encounters a read error, it does not send a payload.

In other words, the current behaviour of qemu is correct, is now
documented to be correct, and should not be changed.

Regards,

-- 
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
       people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
       and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
 -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]