qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] aio_ctx_check: follow CODING_STYLE


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] aio_ctx_check: follow CODING_STYLE
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:40:09 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:48:50AM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 10:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 07/14/2016 07:10 AM, Cao jin wrote:
> > > replace tab with spaces
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >   async.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Whitespace-only changes are best done as part of a series that is
> > already touching nearby code for other reasons (depending on the size of
> > the whitespace changes and on the rest of your patch, it may be okay to
> > squash the whitespace change in place, or better to split into separate
> > patches to make review of both patches easier).  Otherwise, it just
> > makes 'git blame' output dirtier.
> 
> I see.
> Since async.c & aio-posix.c are belong to the same maintaiers, so, Fam &
> Stefan, is it ok to squash this into that "remove useless parameter" patch?
> If not, we can just forget this one.

The "remove useless parameter" patch doesn't touch the function you are
modifying here.  Please don't squash the patches.

Since you have already posted this patch I will merge it.  In the future
please don't submit whitespace changes, tiny coding style cleanups, etc
in by themselves.

Thanks for all your contributions.  I do not want to discourage you but
my view is that code changes should only be made if they fix a bug,
improve performance measurably, add a feature, or significantly improve
the code.

Every patch has a cost in terms of code review, merging/testing, backporting,
bisecting, documentation, etc.  We could discuss each of these in detail
but basically a code change creates work or takes time from one or more
people in these areas.

In a perfect world with unlimited resources all patches would be equally
welcome.  Due to limited resources it's best to submit the types of
patches I mentioned above where the cost/benefit ratio is favorable.

Thanks,
Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]