qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dma-helpers: explicitly pass a


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dma-helpers: explicitly pass alignment into dma-helpers
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 20:23:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.3.0

On 10/10/16 17:34, Eric Blake wrote:

> On 10/09/2016 11:43 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> The hard-coded default alignment is BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, however this is not
>> necessarily the case for all platforms. Use this as the default alignment for
>> all current callers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
>> ---
> 
>> @@ -160,8 +161,8 @@ static void dma_blk_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
>>          return;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if (dbs->iov.size & ~BDRV_SECTOR_MASK) {
>> -        qemu_iovec_discard_back(&dbs->iov, dbs->iov.size & 
>> ~BDRV_SECTOR_MASK);
>> +    if (dbs->iov.size & (dbs->align - 1)) {
>> +        qemu_iovec_discard_back(&dbs->iov, dbs->iov.size & (dbs->align - 
>> 1));
> 
> Would it be any smarter to use osdep.h's QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(dbs->iov.size,
> dbs->align) and QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(dbs->iov.size, dbs->align)?
> Semantically it is the same, but the macros make it obvious what the
> bit-twiddling is doing.
> 
> Unless you think that needs a tweak,
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

I can't say I feel too strongly about it since there are plenty of other
examples of this style in the codebase, so I'm happy to go with whatever
John/Paolo are most happy with.


ATB,

Mark.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]