[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests c
|
From: |
Fam Zheng |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:57:24 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) |
On Tue, 03/07 09:41, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > This is really a live migration fix, so I'm adding Juan and Dave to CC.
> >
> > I suspect the real question is why a field with size 0 was even stored
> > in the vmstate to begin with.
>
> Yes; which field is it that's failing?
See Qingfeng's other reply in this thread. It is irqstate.
Fam
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 0/1] vmstate: fix the failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/06
- [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/06
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Kevin Wolf, 2017/03/07
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Halil Pasic, 2017/03/07
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Halil Pasic, 2017/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Halil Pasic, 2017/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/09