qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] vmdk: Refactor and introduc


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] vmdk: Refactor and introduce new helper functions
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:52:15 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Sat, 03/25 16:48, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> Move the existing vmdk_find_offset_in_cluster() function to the top of
> the driver. Also, introduce a new helper function size_to_clusters()
> which returns the number of clusters for a given size in bytes. Here,
> we leave the last cluster as we need to perform COW for that one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashijeet Acharya <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/vmdk.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c
> index a9bd22b..7795c5f 100644
> --- a/block/vmdk.c
> +++ b/block/vmdk.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,26 @@ static void vmdk_free_last_extent(BlockDriverState *bs)
>      s->extents = g_renew(VmdkExtent, s->extents, s->num_extents);
>  }
>  
> +static inline uint64_t vmdk_find_offset_in_cluster(VmdkExtent *extent,
> +                                                   int64_t offset)
> +{
> +    uint64_t extent_begin_offset, extent_relative_offset;
> +    uint64_t cluster_size = extent->cluster_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +
> +    extent_begin_offset =
> +        (extent->end_sector - extent->sectors) * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +    extent_relative_offset = offset - extent_begin_offset;
> +    return extent_relative_offset % cluster_size;
> +}

Code movement and new code are usually in separate patches.

> +
> +static inline uint64_t size_to_clusters(VmdkExtent *extent, uint64_t size)
> +{
> +    uint64_t cluster_size, round_off_size;
> +    cluster_size = extent->cluster_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +    round_off_size = cluster_size - (size % cluster_size);
> +    return ((size + round_off_size) >> 16) - 1;

Why hardcode 16? You can use DIV_ROUND_UP().

> +}
> +

Usually a static function is added in the patch that actually uses it, which
makes reviewing easier.

Fam

>  static uint32_t vmdk_read_cid(BlockDriverState *bs, int parent)
>  {
>      char *desc;
> @@ -1266,18 +1286,6 @@ static VmdkExtent *find_extent(BDRVVmdkState *s,
>      return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline uint64_t vmdk_find_offset_in_cluster(VmdkExtent *extent,
> -                                                   int64_t offset)
> -{
> -    uint64_t extent_begin_offset, extent_relative_offset;
> -    uint64_t cluster_size = extent->cluster_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> -
> -    extent_begin_offset =
> -        (extent->end_sector - extent->sectors) * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> -    extent_relative_offset = offset - extent_begin_offset;
> -    return extent_relative_offset % cluster_size;
> -}
> -
>  static inline uint64_t vmdk_find_index_in_cluster(VmdkExtent *extent,
>                                                    int64_t sector_num)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]