qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] migration/block: optimize the performance by co


From: 858585 jemmy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] migration/block: optimize the performance by coalescing the same write type
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:03:06 +0800

the reason of MIN_CLUSTER_SIZE is 8192 is base on the performance
test result. the performance is only reduce obviously when cluster_size is
less than 8192.

I write this code, run in guest os. to create the worst condition.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main()
{
    char *zero;
    char *nonzero;
    FILE* fp = fopen("./test.dat", "ab");

    zero = malloc(sizeof(char)*512*8);
    nonzero = malloc(sizeof(char)*512*8);

    memset(zero, 0, sizeof(char)*512*8);
    memset(nonzero, 1, sizeof(char)*512*8);

    while (1) {
        fwrite(zero, sizeof(char)*512*8, 1, fp);
        fwrite(nonzero, sizeof(char)*512*8, 1, fp);
    }
    fclose(fp);
}


On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:55 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Lidong Chen <address@hidden>
>
> This patch optimizes the performance by coalescing the same write type.
> When the zero/non-zero state changes, perform the write for the accumulated
> cluster count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <address@hidden>
> ---
>     Thanks Fam Zheng and Stefan's advice.
> ---
>  migration/block.c | 66 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/block.c b/migration/block.c
> index 060087f..e9c5e21 100644
> --- a/migration/block.c
> +++ b/migration/block.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
>
>  #define MAX_INFLIGHT_IO 512
>
> +#define MIN_CLUSTER_SIZE 8192
> +
>  //#define DEBUG_BLK_MIGRATION
>
>  #ifdef DEBUG_BLK_MIGRATION
> @@ -923,10 +925,11 @@ static int block_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
> version_id)
>                  }
>
>                  ret = bdrv_get_info(blk_bs(blk), &bdi);
> -                if (ret == 0 && bdi.cluster_size > 0 &&
> -                    bdi.cluster_size <= BLOCK_SIZE &&
> -                    BLOCK_SIZE % bdi.cluster_size == 0) {
> +                if (ret == 0 && bdi.cluster_size > 0) {
>                      cluster_size = bdi.cluster_size;
> +                    while (cluster_size < MIN_CLUSTER_SIZE) {
> +                        cluster_size *= 2;
> +                    }
>                  } else {
>                      cluster_size = BLOCK_SIZE;
>                  }
> @@ -943,29 +946,58 @@ static int block_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
> version_id)
>                                          nr_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
>                                          BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP);
>              } else {
> -                int i;
> -                int64_t cur_addr;
> -                uint8_t *cur_buf;
> +                int64_t cur_addr = addr * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +                uint8_t *cur_buf = NULL;
> +                int64_t last_addr = addr * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +                uint8_t *last_buf = NULL;
> +                int64_t end_addr = addr * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE + BLOCK_SIZE;
>
>                  buf = g_malloc(BLOCK_SIZE);
>                  qemu_get_buffer(f, buf, BLOCK_SIZE);
> -                for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_SIZE / cluster_size; i++) {
> -                    cur_addr = addr * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE + i * cluster_size;
> -                    cur_buf = buf + i * cluster_size;
> -
> -                    if ((!block_mig_state.zero_blocks ||
> -                        cluster_size < BLOCK_SIZE) &&
> -                        buffer_is_zero(cur_buf, cluster_size)) {
> -                        ret = blk_pwrite_zeroes(blk, cur_addr,
> -                                                cluster_size,
> +                cur_buf = buf;
> +                last_buf = buf;
> +
> +                while (last_addr < end_addr) {
> +                    int is_zero = 0;
> +                    int buf_size = MIN(end_addr - cur_addr, cluster_size);
> +
> +                    /* If the "zero blocks" migration capability is enabled
> +                     * and the buf_size == BLOCK_SIZE, then the source QEMU
> +                     * process has already scanned for zeroes. CPU is wasted
> +                     * scanning for zeroes in the destination QEMU process.
> +                     */
> +                    if (block_mig_state.zero_blocks &&
> +                        buf_size == BLOCK_SIZE) {
> +                        is_zero = 0;
> +                    } else {
> +                        is_zero = buffer_is_zero(cur_buf, buf_size);
> +                    }
> +
> +                    cur_addr += buf_size;
> +                    cur_buf += buf_size;
> +                    while (cur_addr < end_addr) {
> +                        buf_size = MIN(end_addr - cur_addr, cluster_size);
> +                        if (is_zero != buffer_is_zero(cur_buf, buf_size)) {
> +                            break;
> +                        }
> +                        cur_addr += buf_size;
> +                        cur_buf += buf_size;
> +                    }
> +
> +                    if (is_zero) {
> +                        ret = blk_pwrite_zeroes(blk, last_addr,
> +                                                cur_addr - last_addr,
>                                                  BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP);
>                      } else {
> -                        ret = blk_pwrite(blk, cur_addr, cur_buf,
> -                                         cluster_size, 0);
> +                        ret = blk_pwrite(blk, last_addr, last_buf,
> +                                         cur_addr - last_addr, 0);
>                      }
>                      if (ret < 0) {
>                          break;
>                      }
> +
> +                    last_addr = cur_addr;
> +                    last_buf = cur_buf;
>                  }
>                  g_free(buf);
>              }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]