[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] German BSI analysed security of KVM / QEMU
|
From: |
Alberto Garcia |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] German BSI analysed security of KVM / QEMU |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:47:31 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) |
On Mon 16 Oct 2017 03:38:12 PM CEST, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> Another thing that made me a bit sad is that they mention qed as a
>> better performing alternative for qcow2. Even in 2017, people keep
>> spreading this nonsense. :-(
>
> Probably because when you google for QED you inevitably hit this article
> near the top:
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY0MQ
>
> And there's little clear information on QEMU website to show that QED
> is essentially an obsolete experiment.
I remember having to ask on IRC in order to learn what the status of QED
was, I couldn't figure it out just by reading the documentation or even
the mailing list archives.
Berto