Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Document --force-share / -U

[Fam Zheng]

On Thu, 12/07 10:53, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/07/2017 04:58 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:44:53PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  qemu-img.texi | 8 ++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/qemu-img.texi b/qemu-img.texi
> >> index fdcf120f36..3aa63aad55 100644
> >> --- a/qemu-img.texi
> >> +++ b/qemu-img.texi
> >> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ exclusive with the @var{-O} parameters. It is currently 
> >> required to also use
> >>  the @var{-n} parameter to skip image creation. This restriction may be 
> >> relaxed
> >>  in a future release.
> >>  
> >> address@hidden --force-share (-U)
> >> +
> >> +If specified, qemu-img will open the image with shared permissions, which 
> >> makes
> > 
> > Does 'texi' requires to quote tools like `qemu-img` (or single quotes),
> > to highlight them in documentation?
> 
> Our usual markup appears to be:
> 
> @code{qemu-img}

Sounds good.

> 
> > 
> >> +it less likely to conflict with a running guest's permissions due to image
> >> +locking. For example, this can be used to get the image information (with
> >> +'info' subcommand) when the image is used by a running guest. Note that 
> >> this
> >> +could produce inconsistent result because of concurrent metadata changes, 
> >> etc..
> > 
> > Super nit-pick:  an ellipsis[*] is three dots :-), so, when applying you
> > might want to: s/../.../
> > 
> > [*] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ellipsis
> 
> Except that both "etc." and "..." independently convey a sense of
> continuation, which means that using both at once is both redundant
> (just one will do) and difficult to argue how to typeset (since 'etc.'
> is often written with an explicit '.' to emphasize that is an
> abbreviation, does that mean you have to write 'etc.''...' for a total
> of 4 dots?).

I have the impression that "etc." is more correct than "etc" so I used even at
the end of the sensence where there is another period '.', making it "etc..".

If ending the paragraph with "etc." is enough, we can drop one ".".

Fam