qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block: fix write with zero flag set and iovecto


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block: fix write with zero flag set and iovector provided
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:11:41 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:16:31PM +0300, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> The normal bdrv_co_pwritev() use is either
>   - BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE reset and iovector provided
>   - BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE set and iovector == NULL
> 
> while
>   - the flag reset and iovector == NULL is an assertion failure
>     in bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev()
>   - the flag set and iovector provided is in fact allowed
>     (the flag prevails and zeroes are written)
> 
> However the alignment logic does not support the latter case so the padding
> areas get overwritten with zeroes.

Please include a test case.  Berto mentioned that bdrv_pwrite_zeroes()
hits this issue, that might be one way to test it.

> Solution could be to forbid such case or just use bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev()
> alignment for it which also makes the code a bit more obvious anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index 7ea4023..cf63fd0 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_pwritev(BdrvChild *child,
>       */
>      tracked_request_begin(&req, bs, offset, bytes, BDRV_TRACKED_WRITE);
>  
> -    if (!qiov) {
> +    if (flags & BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE) {
>          ret = bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev(child, offset, bytes, flags, &req);
>          goto out;
>      }

Looks good.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]