Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 2/4] qcow2: Document some maximum size constraints

[Eric Blake]

On 02/26/2018 10:25 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 22 Feb 2018 04:59:20 PM CET, Eric Blake wrote:
> > While at it, notice that since we cannot map any virtual cluster to
> > any address higher than 64 PB (56 bits) (due to the L1/L2 field
> > encoding), it makes little sense to require the refcount table to
> > access host offsets beyond that point.
>
> But refcount blocks are not addressed by L2 tables, so in principle it
> should be possible to have refcount blocks after the first 64PB.

But (if we don't make this change) that's about all you can usefully 
have (and it would be a self-referencing refcount block).

> But I agree that it's a good idea to set that as a maximum possible
> physical size of the qcow2 image.
>
> > @@ -341,7 +355,7 @@ Refcount table entry:
> >
> >       Bit  0 -  8:    Reserved (set to 0)
> >
> > -         9 - 63:    Bits 9-63 of the offset into the image file at which the
> > +         9 - 55:    Bits 9-55 of the offset into the image file at which the
> >                       refcount block starts. Must be aligned to a cluster
> >                       boundary.
> >
> > @@ -349,6 +363,8 @@ Refcount table entry:
> >                       been allocated. All refcounts managed by this refcount 
> > block
> >                       are 0.
> >
> > +        56 - 63:    Reserved (set to 0)
>
> Are we not updating REFT_OFFSET_MASK as well?

We could, but that should be a separate patch from the spec change.  We 
could also add some validation that any offsets in the header point to 
less than the 64PB limit.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org