[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 6/6] qemu-iotests: Test luks QMP image creation
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 6/6] qemu-iotests: Test luks QMP image creation |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:26:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 03/09/2018 11:27 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/208 | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/208.out | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc | 2 +-
tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
4 files changed, 349 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/208
create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/208.out
I've seen another patch using 208 - someone gets to renumber ;)
+# creator
address@hidden
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+status=1 # failure is the default!
Whatever happened to Jeff's efforts to reduce pointless boilerplate?
+function do_run_qemu()
+{
+ echo Testing: "$@"
+ $QEMU -nographic -qmp stdio -serial none "$@"
Is -nodefaults better than -serial none?
At any rate, my comments are trivial, whether or not you do something
about them, so
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/6] luks: Separate image file creation from formatting, (continued)
[Qemu-block] [PATCH 2/6] luks: Create block_crypto_co_create_generic(), Kevin Wolf, 2018/03/09
[Qemu-block] [PATCH 5/6] luks: Catch integer overflow for huge sizes, Kevin Wolf, 2018/03/09
[Qemu-block] [PATCH 6/6] qemu-iotests: Test luks QMP image creation, Kevin Wolf, 2018/03/09