qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] ide: implement simple legacy/native mode switching fo


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] ide: implement simple legacy/native mode switching for PCI IDE controllers
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:19:20 +0100 (CET)

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 19/11/2023 21:43, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
This series adds a simple implementation of legacy/native mode switching for PCI
IDE controllers and updates the via-ide device to use it.

The approach I take here is to add a new pci_ide_update_mode() function which handles management of the PCI BARs and legacy IDE ioports for each mode to avoid exposing
details of the internal logic to individual PCI IDE controllers.

As noted in [1] this is extracted from a local WIP branch I have which contains
further work in this area. However for the moment I've kept it simple (and
restricted it to the via-ide device) which is good enough for Zoltan's PPC
images whilst paving the way for future improvements after 8.2.

Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-10/msg05403.html

v3:
- Rebase onto master
- Move ide_portio_list[] and ide_portio_list2[] to IDE core to prevent duplication in
 hw/ide/pci.c
- Don't zero BARs when switching from native mode to legacy mode, instead always force  them to read zero as suggested in the PCI IDE specification (note: this also appears
 to fix the fuloong2e machine booting from IDE)

Not sure you're getting this, see also:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-11/msg04167.html
but this seems to break latest version of the AmigaOS driver for some reason. I assume this is the BAR zeroing that causes this as it works with v2 series and nothing else changed in v3 that could cause this. Testing was done by Rene Engel, cc'd so maybe he can add more info. It seems to work with my patch that sets BARs to legacy values and with v2 that sets them to 0 but not with v3 which should also read 0 but maybe something is off here.

Is this document here accurate as to how it works on real hardware? https://intuitionbase.com/hints.php.

That should be about right. On QEMU the U-boot env vars won't work because NVRAM is not emulated yet so they can't be saved but you can call idetool from startup-sequence boot script instead for same effect (UDMA is enabled a bit later with that but after that it's the same).

I can't understand why the base OS is attempting any access to BAR 4 if BMDMA isn't enabled by default on real hardware due to hardware bugs.

Real hardware had problems with DMA (the VIA chip was also infamous for it on PC hardware and later also the ArticiaS was found to have its own problems) so the default is to use IDE in PIO mode and UDMA has to be enabled manually. But if it works (and it should on QEMU) it's much faster so we want to enable it.

Are we sure that the idetool hacks given in the link above to enable BMDMA haven't already been run on the AmigaOS install when testing an earlier version of the patches?

It was tested with my original series and works with that as my patch sets the default vaules for BARs and the driver reads it correctly. Then we tested your series too and I've noted for v2 already that it misses the degault value for BAR4. Other BARs don't matter as it will apparently use ISA IDE ports when it gets 0 or it knows that in legacy mode these shoud be the port values but seems to read BAR4 for UDMA and only works if the right default value is there, otherwise it lists DMA BAR 0 on start.

Finally is there a bootable AmigaOS demo ISO somewhere that can be used for testing?

Unfortunately AmigaOS4 is only available commercially, no free demo is avaialable.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]