Re: [Qemu-devel] benchmarks

[James Boddington]

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:09 pm, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Don't forget bochs. (I know its not commercial, but its AFAIK the only
> viable free alternative to qemu)

I have been playing a little bit with timing something representative of 
what I have been doing. For this I timed building bash. This involved 
fetching from a ftp server, unpacking, configure, build and install.

native on an athlon xp1600 1 minute 40 seconds
uml (2.4.24) in tt mode      just over 13 minutes
in a qemu (not qemu-fast) virtual machine 30 minutes
bochs took 118 minutes

These are recent cvs snapshots for both qemu and bochs. Used the default 
compile flags.

-- 

   James