[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts
From: |
André Braga |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:48:48 -0300 |
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:41:42 +0200, Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden> wrote:
> - This patch should work with qemu, not qemu-fast. The future of
> qemu-fast is to use a kernel module to have near native performances. It
> is not worthwhile to invest time in soft MMU or dynamic translation when
> you can just execute the code as is !
I hope I'm the only one confused here: does that mean that
qemu-softmmu won't be (as energically) developed anymore? Is the focus
being put on qemu-fast?
I really hope not :) The Solaris, Mac OS X, Windows, *BSD, BeOS (I'm
almost taking the plunge to port this one), SkyOS and whatnot people
would be truly thankful ;D
--
"A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God"
Alan J. Perlis
- [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Magnus Damm, 2004/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Piotras, 2004/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Piotras, 2004/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Dan Sands, 2004/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Piotras, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Martin Garton, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts,
André Braga <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Magnus Damm, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Magnus Damm, 2004/10/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu thoughts, Magnus Damm, 2004/10/20