qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/hw openpic.c


From: Thayne Harbaugh
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/hw openpic.c
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:35:38 -0700

On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 19:01 -0500, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> CVSROOT:      /cvsroot/qemu
> Module name:  qemu
> Branch:       
> Changes by:   Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden>        05/02/09 00:01:34
> 
> Modified files:
>       hw             : openpic.c 
> 
> Log message:
>       spelling fix
> 
> CVSWeb URLs:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/qemu/qemu/hw/openpic.c.diff?tr1=1.5&tr2=1.6&r1=text&r2=text


There was another change in openpic.c that I haven't seen committed:

@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@
         break;
     case 0x10: /* TIBC */
        if ((opp->timers[idx].ticc & 0x80000000) != 0 &&
-           (val & 0x800000000) == 0 &&
+           (val & 0x80000000) == 0 &&
             (opp->timers[idx].tibc & 0x80000000) != 0)
            opp->timers[idx].ticc &= ~0x80000000;
        opp->timers[idx].tibc = val;


It's because the constant 0x800000000 is larger than a uint32_t (it
appears that the way it was will always cause "(val & 0x800000000) == 0"
to always be true).  I haven't tested it - I just made the change
because it looked "obvious".  Please let me know if there's some black
magic that this "fix" breaks.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]