Re: [Qemu-devel] FreeOSZoo will stop March 1, 2005

[Daniel Egger]

On 13.02.2005, at 01:06, Jernej Simončič wrote:

> > If you only intend to run Linux VMs and don't have a problem
> > patching the kernel sources this is a very viable approach to
> > get something which is not possible anymore *without* kqemu
> > which is more flexible but does only run on 32bit kernels ATM.
>
> You don't understand - I was asking what are you loosing with "new" 
> Qemu
> without the kernel module compared to Qemu before the kernel module was
> introduced. I know that with the kernel module Qemu runs much faster, 
> but if
> you don't want to use it due to it's licence, you haven't lost anything
> compared to before the module was available. Or have you?

Please do read the mails before responding.

qemu-fast is the key point which you're obviously missing.

Servus,
      Daniel

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part