qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Remove qemu-fast warning


From: Darryl Dixon
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Remove qemu-fast warning
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:06:23 +1300

Sorry, I wasn't very clear in the previous post.  I was referring to the current Qemu CVS *not* including Paul Brook's patch.  The ./configure will note that SDL support = no, but it will happily make && make install with no errors and will run, albeit without any graphical output.

Cheers,
D

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 18:05 -0500, Jim C. Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:57:26AM +1300, Darryl Dixon wrote:
> Incidentally to this, I discovered that qemu will both ./configure (with
> --target-list=i386-softmmu) and make && make install fine with no
> sdl-devel installed, and will run fine, but will not have any graphical
> output.  I assume that this is technically a bug, as it doesn't warn at
> any point that this will be the case.
> 
> Cheers,
> D
> 

The bug would be that it doesn't warn. It should state that there will be no
graphical output if it can't find libsdl-devel. (Tho you should have gotten
a warning that SDL was not detected period.)

Does this bug occur w/o Paul Brooks patch as well?

qemu needs libsdl-devel in order to compile correctly and link to the libsdl
library, in case that was not made clear before.

> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 21:07 +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> 
> >The attached patch removes the warning about lack of static SDL. This is only 
> >userd by qemu-fast, which isn't build by default. Anyone building qemu-fast 
> >should know what they're doing anyway. The current warning just confuses 
> >people.
> >
> >Please apply.
> >
> >Paul
> >_______________________________________________
> >Qemu-devel mailing list
> >address@hidden
> >http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]