qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qvm86, kqemu and video speed


From: Struan Bartlett
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qvm86, kqemu and video speed
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:54:01 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5

For your information, I received a response from Diego to my query about the status of the source code of his driver.

Unfortunately he has had a hard drive crash, and with the crash, lost the source.  He reported that the drivers were delevoped after the sample driver for the ET4000 chip, with minor changes made to make it work with bochs, like the bank switching and VGA screen mode.  His BXVGA.DLL was develop after the VGA.DLL sample that came with the Windows NT developer kit.  He said he is trying to remake the source from a version of the ET4000 source that he found but that will be when he gets some time, because it takes a long time just to boot and debug bochs VGA drivers.  I hope this is helpful.

In the meantime, Filip Navarra's driver is apparently the only open-source Windows 32-bit video driver available.

Struan Bartlett wrote:
I agree with both views: Qemu should provide the Cirrus emulation option for those who need full emulation, and if we manage to emulate a "custom" driver model, that would be an option for those who need speed.

This has come up before, and it will come up again. Apparently, we don't know whether Diego's BochsVGA source is open. However we do know Filip Navarra's is (and I've posted what I have on http://www.praguespringpeople.org/Struan/Software/QEMU/Drivers/ for the interested).

Struan

Paul Brook wrote:
On Monday 11 April 2005 16:01, James Mastros wrote:
  
After that, I think the best thing to do is to move from emulating a
standard video card to defining our own that maps from the operations
that the OS calls its video driver on to the operations that SDL
implements, leaving any that do not map simply for the OS to emulate, on
the theory that it probably knows how to better then we do.  However,
this is a much larger undertaking, as it requires learning the driver
model of the guest OSes.
    

I agree that emulating a "custom" driver model should give better performance 
than emulating real hardware (VMware does this). However I think you should 
provide all the functionality you possibly can, even if the host doesn't 
provide native acceleration for it. It's always going to be faster to do 
something in software on the host than it is on the guest.

Paul


_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
  

_______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]