[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support
From: |
Thomas Steffen |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support |
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2005 11:59:49 +0200 |
On 5/20/05, John Hogerhuis <address@hidden> wrote:
> But once you are past that point gcc for a given arch, gcc isn't
> really going to help you any more. So bring on the hand
> coding/optimizations.
And for popular combinations of architectures, such as x86 or PPC on
each other, I absolute agree. As in any other routine, you can
probably squeeze out a few cycles if you try hard enough.
> And that's because you can always make
> use of what gcc did if you can't think of anything better.
So the magic stays with us :-). You need some more complexity in the
build process, but I agree that it is a logical improvement.
Thomas
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Gwenole Beauchesne, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Paul Brook, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Gwenole Beauchesne, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Paul Brook, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Thomas Steffen, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Paul Brook, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Tim Walker, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Paul Brook, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Thomas Steffen, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, John Hogerhuis, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support,
Thomas Steffen <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Paul Brook, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, Ian Rogers, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support, McMullan, Jason, 2005/05/19