qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] new kqemu win98 hack affects FreeBSD


From: Juergen Lock
Subject: [Qemu-devel] new kqemu win98 hack affects FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:07:48 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Hi!

 I got a report that kqemu doesnt speed up FreeBSD guests anymore,
and found out that the win98 hack stops kqemu from being used.
If i disable it and add this to cpu-exec.c,

Index: cpu-exec.c
@@ -232,6 +232,13 @@
 #ifdef USE_KQEMU
             if (kqemu_is_ok(env) && env->interrupt_request == 0) {
                 int ret;
+#if 1
+               static uint32_t lastldtlimit = 0;
+               if (env->ldt.limit != lastldtlimit) {
+                       lastldtlimit = env->ldt.limit;
+                       printf("new ldt limit 0x%x\n", (int)lastldtlimit);
+               }
+#endif
                 env->eflags = env->eflags | cc_table[CC_OP].compute_all() | 
(DF & DF_MASK);
                 ret = kqemu_cpu_exec(env);
                 /* put eflags in CPU temporary format */


then a short run with FreeSBIE gives this:

new ldt limit 0xffff
new ldt limit 0xfff
new ldt limit 0x1fff
new ldt limit 0xfff
new ldt limit 0x1fff
new ldt limit 0xfff
new ldt limit 0x1fff
new ldt limit 0x87
new ldt limit 0x1fff
new ldt limit 0x87
new ldt limit 0x1fff
new ldt limit 0xfff
new ldt limit 0x2fff
new ldt limit 0x87
new ldt limit 0xfff
new ldt limit 0x87
new ldt limit 0xfff
new ldt limit 0x87
new ldt limit 0xfff

 So maybe we need a new switch -win98-hack... :)

        Juergen




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]