[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4 |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:13:51 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
On Monday 30 October 2006 22:54, Stephen Torri wrote:
> > As I said before, the x86 target is a hybrid of the new and old code. ie.
> > if it didn't work before it probably won't work after. configure
> > with --target-list=m68k-user and it should work fine with gcc4.
> >
> > Paul
>
> I need a x86 instruction set simulator that can step-by-step execute
> could and allow me access to the internals. This is why I have looked at
> qemu because of a recommendation from a developer of Ptlsim. It was
> suggested that qemu would be lighter weight for what I need. So what do
> you suggest I use for a x86 instruction set simulator?
Use qemu, and build it with gcc3.
Paul
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Stephen Torri, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4,
Paul Brook <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/22