|
From: | Fabrice Bellard |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Makefile.target vl.h hw/acpi.c hw/adlib.c ... |
Date: | Sun, 08 Apr 2007 01:26:03 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) |
Hi,
I can only fix the code that I have access to.IMHO your request that I revert changes because they allegedly break code that noone else has access to is unreasonable. My changes are a significant cleanup to qemu internals.However if there is agreement from other maintainers I will revert my patch.
I don't think you need to revert your patch. Personally, I would have changed the following:
1) The code is more generic than IRQs, it can be applied to any logic signal, so the naming should show it.
2) I don't like hiding pointers in types, so I would use for example 'QEMUSignal *' instead of 'qemu_irq'.
Regarding the PPC problem, maybe you could just revert the patches in the MIPS and PowerPC CPUs structures, as I don't think it is necessary to move the IRQ code at this level now.
BTW, I have a small PREP test image that I can publish.I am planning since some time to add to the QEMU web site an automatic regression testing system which will automatically launch many OSes with the current CVS version. I had no time to do it recently, but if no one does it before I'll try to complete it !
Regards, Fabrice.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |