qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Disable implicit self-modifying code suppo


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Disable implicit self-modifying code support for RISC CPUs
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 09:12:19 +0200

On 11/4/07, Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > RISC CPUs don't support self-modifying code unless the affected area
> > is flushed explicitly. This patch disables the extra effort for SMC.
> > The changes in this version would affect all CPUs except x86, but I'd
> > like to see if there are problems with some target, so that the
> > committed change can be limited. Without comments, I'll just disable
> > SMC for Sparc, as there are no problems. So please comment, especially
> > if you want to "opt in".
> >
> > For some reason, I can't disable all TB/TLB flushing, for example
> > there was already one line with TARGET_HAS_SMC || 1, but removing the
> > || 1 part causes crashing. Does anyone know why?
>
> With the current QEMU architecture, you cannot disable self-modifying
> code as you did. This is why I did not fully supported the
> TARGET_HAS_SMC flag. The problem is that the translator make the
> assumption that the RAM and the TB contents are consistent for example
> when handling exceptions. Suppressing this assumption is possible but
> requires more work.

I think the conclusion is that we would need some kind of emulator for
i-cache for any accurate emulation. And handling the boot loader may
need an uncached mode.

The performance benefit from disabling SMC is unnoticeable according
to my benchmarks. Adding a TB flush to i-cache flushing made things
worse. Moreover, SMC is hardly ever used on Sparc.

I'll just commit the debug statement fixes and the fix that separates
PAGE_READ from PAGE_EXEC for Sparc.

Maybe this issue should be documented in qemu-tech.texi, there are
also frequently some questions about caches.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]