Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: gcc

[andrzej zaborowski]

On 04/12/2007, Antti P Miettinen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Rick Vernam <address@hidden> writes:
> > any comments on the current status of moving beyond dependency on GCC 3.3.6?
>
> Sorry for a vague ignorant question, but would the gcc-4 issues be
> affected in any way if the ops were inside a big function (use labels
> to find them) vs the current use of separate functions?

They might likely be affected but it would be an equally fragile and
compiler-dependent solution and I think not worth putting the time it
would take to adapt dyngen to this.
Regards