Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Dbus support - a proposal management API

[Avi Kivity]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Yuval Kashtan wrote:
> > As I can see,
> > There is HUGH interest in management API for QEMU.
> > seemly, DBus is NOT the right solution for direct integration into 
> > QEMU as it is not cross platform enough, pose extra dependency and 
> > (probably) not suitable for embedded systems.
> >
> > Keeping only the "old" monitor interface with no formal interface 
> > will make QEMU harder to integrate with as it requires extra work
>
> Why can't we make the monitor interface a "formal" interface?

Because then fixing a type or extending the interface becomes a pain.

It's also much more difficult to specify a text-base interface 
completey, compared to a C api (where sometimes all you need is the 
header and a few comments).


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function