[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:31:43 +0200 |
On 1/2/08, Paul Brook <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Also the opaque parameter may need to be different for each function,
> > it just didn't matter for the unassigned memory case.
>
> Do you really have systems where independent devices need to respond to
> different sized accesses to the same address?
I don't think so. But one day unassigned or even normal RAM memory
access may need an opaque parameter, so passing the device's opaque to
unassigned memory handler is wrong.
- [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Blue Swirl, 2008/01/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Fabrice Bellard, 2008/01/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Blue Swirl, 2008/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Paul Brook, 2008/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c,
Blue Swirl <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Paul Brook, 2008/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Blue Swirl, 2008/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Paul Brook, 2008/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Fabrice Bellard, 2008/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Blue Swirl, 2008/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Paul Brook, 2008/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Blue Swirl, 2008/01/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c, Paul Brook, 2008/01/04