[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Breakage with local APIC routing
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Breakage with local APIC routing |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:14:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:32:28PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> due to the change in revision 3371 (well, at that time, CVS was used,
>>> which was no better than Subversion) installation of win64 is broken in
>>> QEmu. The commit message reads like this:
>>>
>>> Don't route PIC interrupts through the local APIC if the local
>>> APIC config says so. By Ari Kivity.
>>>
>>> A bit of research showed that the patch was actually originally from Qing
>>> He, but he told me privately that the part that actually broke win64 (the
>>> removal of the call to cpu_reset_interrupt(), as opposed to moving that
>>> call into the "else" condition) was not part of his patch.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, a lot has been done to the APIC handling in the meantime,
>>> so it is not a simple matter of a revert.
>>>
>>> Being a complete idiot when it comes to APICs, I have no clue how to fix
>>> the issue.
>>>
>>> However, I am quite willing to test whatever patch is thrown at me.
>>>
>>> Can somebody help?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dscho
>> See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/24739.
>> EFI BIOS is affected by the same problem.
>>
>
> With the difference that the patch proposed in this thread actually
> fixes the problem in case of the EFI BIOS.
[ Got it working, was to dumb to feed in the right file as bios... ]
Yeah, indeed, my patch cures the EFI issue. Interesting. But I still
don't understand what problem Windows has.
Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Breakage with local APIC routing, (continued)