|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1 of 3] [UPDATE] vnc dynamic resolution |
Date: | Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:32:59 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:Stefano Stabellini wrote:Perhaps the source of my confusion is the use of red_max and red_max1. Could you try some more descriptive names? I understand what the codeis doing now but it's very easy to confuse the two masks.I understand. I went with red_max1 because we were already using this "notation" with red_shift and red_shift1.
Yeah, I assumed that's why.
How do you suggest I should call them?
server_red_max and client_red_max seem like the obvious candidates to me. Changing the shift1's would also be a nice fix.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |