Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall

[Riku Voipio]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:28:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:08:21PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> I don't think that it's great idea. If libc/kernel headers doesn't provide
> the syscall we shouldn't implement them. The exception is syscalls without
> libc's wrapper. Like gettid(2).

Well, defining syscalls appears to be a common practice in qemu for the
*at family of syscalls (openat, linkat, ...), so it doesn't seem that
far off for futimesat().

-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups