qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall


From: Thiemo Seufer
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:13:40 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:42:34PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:28:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:08:21PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > I don't think that it's great idea. If libc/kernel headers doesn't provide
> > > the syscall we shouldn't implement them. The exception is syscalls without
> > > libc's wrapper. Like gettid(2).
> > 
> > Well, defining syscalls appears to be a common practice in qemu for the
> > *at family of syscalls (openat, linkat, ...), so it doesn't seem that
> > far off for futimesat().
> 
> *at syscalls ware implemented in linux 2.6.16. glibc's wrappers to this
> syscalls were implemented in glibc 2.4. Both of them relesed more than two
> and half years ago.
> 
> I think we can drop this crap now.

Current Debian stable uses glibc 2.3.6.


Thiemo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]