[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall
From: |
Thiemo Seufer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:13:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:42:34PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:28:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:08:21PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > I don't think that it's great idea. If libc/kernel headers doesn't provide
> > > the syscall we shouldn't implement them. The exception is syscalls without
> > > libc's wrapper. Like gettid(2).
> >
> > Well, defining syscalls appears to be a common practice in qemu for the
> > *at family of syscalls (openat, linkat, ...), so it doesn't seem that
> > far off for futimesat().
>
> *at syscalls ware implemented in linux 2.6.16. glibc's wrappers to this
> syscalls were implemented in glibc 2.4. Both of them relesed more than two
> and half years ago.
>
> I think we can drop this crap now.
Current Debian stable uses glibc 2.3.6.
Thiemo
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Riku Voipio, 2008/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Kirill A. Shutemov, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Riku Voipio, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Laurent Desnogues, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Riku Voipio, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Kirill A. Shutemov, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Riku Voipio, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Kirill A. Shutemov, 2008/09/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall,
Thiemo Seufer <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall, Kirill A. Shutemov, 2008/09/18