Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SH: Add prefi, icbi, synco

[Laurent Desnogues]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Paul Brook <address@hidden> wrote:
> Doing fine grained features isn't that
> hard. MIPS, sparc, arm, ppc, m68k and sparc already do this.

So let's say someone finds some unprotected use of some ARM
instructions, should that be reported and is there any hope the
patch will ever be considered by the maintainer of the ARM target?
(Examples are ldrex/strex and ubfx/sbfx.)

Also what about undetected undefined instructions which I asked
about last May?

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-05/msg00844.html

Given the lack of answer at that time, I thought it didn't matter.  I now
see I was wrong.  It's a pity communication is almost impossible.


Laurent