[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] qcow2: Clean-up update_cluster_refcount().
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] qcow2: Clean-up update_cluster_refcount(). |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:22:47 +0100 |
Le vendredi 07 novembre 2008 à 09:54 +0100, Kevin Wolf a écrit :
> Laurent Vivier schrieb:
> > Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008 à 18:32 +0100, Kevin Wolf a écrit :
> >> Laurent Vivier schrieb:
> >>> pièce jointe document texte brut
> >>> (0001-Clean-up-update_cluster_refcount.patch)
> >>> Move some parts to alloc_refcount_block() and block cache
> >>> checking to load_refcount_block().
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>> block-qcow2.c | 71
> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Index: qemu/block-qcow2.c
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- qemu.orig/block-qcow2.c 2008-11-06 16:34:46.000000000 +0100
> >>> +++ qemu/block-qcow2.c 2008-11-06 16:40:27.000000000 +0100
> >>> @@ -2169,6 +2169,10 @@ static int load_refcount_block(BlockDriv
> >>> {
> >>> BDRVQcowState *s = bs->opaque;
> >>> int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (refcount_block_offset == s->refcount_block_cache_offset)
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> ret = bdrv_pread(s->hd, refcount_block_offset,
> >>> s->refcount_block_cache,
> >>> s->cluster_size);
> >>> if (ret != s->cluster_size)
> >>> @@ -2189,11 +2193,8 @@ static int get_refcount(BlockDriverState
> >>> refcount_block_offset = s->refcount_table[refcount_table_index];
> >>> if (!refcount_block_offset)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> - if (refcount_block_offset != s->refcount_block_cache_offset) {
> >>> - /* better than nothing: return allocated if read error */
> >>> - if (load_refcount_block(bs, refcount_block_offset) < 0)
> >>> - return 1;
> >>> - }
> >>> + if (load_refcount_block(bs, refcount_block_offset) < 0)
> >>> + return 1;
> >> Please retain the comment saying that 1 is not the correct value but we
> >> default to allocated for safety if the block could not be read. I don't
> >> think this is obvious.
> >
> > I totally agree with you, but it's just a code move, I don't want to
> > change anything except the line numbers.
> >
> > I think this kind of change must have its own patch.
>
> No, it's a move which drops a comment and it shouldn't do that. ;-)
>
> > - /* better than nothing: return allocated if read error */
Oops...
Laurent
--
------------------ address@hidden ------------------
"Tout ce qui est impossible reste à accomplir" Jules Verne
"Things are only impossible until they're not" Jean-Luc Picard