[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: fix warning without CONFIG_KVM

[Anthony Liguori]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Isn't it cleaner to provide an empty static inline in the !CONFIG_KVM
> case? Not all compilers might be smart enough to optimize this function
> away.
>   

kvm_enabled() is (0) when !CONFIG_KVM so that's why this is a warning 
and not an error.  The function call disappears during linking from dead 
code elimination.  There is no routine overhead when !CONFIG_KVM.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Jan
>
>