qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [5734] Make KVM slot management more robust


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [5734] Make KVM slot management more robust
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:41:19 +0000

Revision: 5734
          http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=5734
Author:   aliguori
Date:     2008-11-18 15:41:18 +0000 (Tue, 18 Nov 2008)

Log Message:
-----------
Make KVM slot management more robust

KVM keeps track of physical memory based on slots in the kernel.  The current
code that translates QEMU memory mappings to slots work but is not robust
in the fact of reregistering partial regions of memory.

This patch does the right thing for reregistering partial regions of memory.  It
also prevents QEMU from using KVM private slots.

Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>

Modified Paths:
--------------
    trunk/kvm-all.c

Modified: trunk/kvm-all.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/kvm-all.c     2008-11-18 09:32:01 UTC (rev 5733)
+++ trunk/kvm-all.c     2008-11-18 15:41:18 UTC (rev 5734)
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@
     int i;
 
     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
+        /* KVM private memory slots */
+        if (i >= 8 && i < 12)
+            continue;
         if (s->slots[i].memory_size == 0)
             return &s->slots[i];
     }
@@ -327,10 +330,45 @@
 
             kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, mem);
         } else if (start_addr >= mem->guest_phys_addr &&
-                   (start_addr + size) <= (mem->guest_phys_addr + 
mem->memory_size))
+                   (start_addr + size) <= (mem->guest_phys_addr +
+                                           mem->memory_size)) {
+            KVMSlot slot;
+            target_phys_addr_t mem_start;
+            ram_addr_t mem_size, mem_offset;
+
+            /* Not splitting */
+            if ((phys_offset - (start_addr - mem->guest_phys_addr)) == 
+                ((uint8_t *)mem->userspace_addr - phys_ram_base))
+                return;
+
+            /* unregister whole slot */
+            memcpy(&slot, mem, sizeof(slot));
+            mem->memory_size = 0;
+            kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, mem);
+
+            /* register prefix slot */
+            mem_start = slot.guest_phys_addr;
+            mem_size = start_addr - slot.guest_phys_addr;
+            mem_offset = (uint8_t *)slot.userspace_addr - phys_ram_base;
+            if (mem_size)
+                kvm_set_phys_mem(mem_start, mem_size, mem_offset);
+
+            /* register new slot */
+            kvm_set_phys_mem(start_addr, size, phys_offset);
+
+            /* register suffix slot */
+            mem_start = start_addr + size;
+            mem_offset += mem_size + size;
+            mem_size = slot.memory_size - mem_size - size;
+            if (mem_size)
+                kvm_set_phys_mem(mem_start, mem_size, mem_offset);
+
             return;
+        } else {
+            printf("Registering overlapping slot\n");
+            abort();
+        }
     }
-
     /* KVM does not need to know about this memory */
     if (flags >= IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED)
         return;






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]