qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [6343] Fix false positive for AIO on OpenBSD


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6343] Fix false positive for AIO on OpenBSD
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:03:47 +0200

On 1/16/09, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> > On 1/16/09, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Blue Swirl wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Revision: 6343
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=6343
> > >
> > >
> > > > Author:   blueswir1
> > > > Date:     2009-01-16 18:13:32 +0000 (Fri, 16 Jan 2009)
> > > >
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > -----------
> > > > Fix false positive for AIO on OpenBSD
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >  If OpenBSD doesn't have sigqueue, we could just replace it with kill.
> I
> > > don't think we need to disable AIO.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > struct sigevent is also missing, is that a problem?
> >
> >
>
>  It's just used for assigning the signal value.  We could have a #ifdef
> HAVE_SIGEVENT and define it if it doesn't exist--or just change the aioinit
> structure to use an int instead of the struct sigevent structure.  It's
> sigevent for glibc compatibility but that's not really important at this
> stage.

Ok. Should kill be used always or just when sigqueue is not available?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]