[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Add target memory mapping API
|
From: |
Paul Brook |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Add target memory mapping API |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:37:11 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
> Should there be one bounce buffer for each vcpu? Eventually the device
> model lock will be refactored to allow more parallelism, right?
Doubtful. Making the device models threadsafe would be a lot of work,
introduce lots of subtle and hard to reproduce bugs, and probably give very
little practical benefit.
Paul
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add target memory mapping API, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add target memory mapping API, Anthony Liguori, 2009/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add target memory mapping API, Ian Jackson, 2009/01/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add target memory mapping API, Anthony Liguori, 2009/01/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add target memory mapping API, Ian Jackson, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add target memory mapping API, Anthony Liguori, 2009/01/26
[Qemu-devel] Re: Add target memory mapping API, Mike Day, 2009/01/21
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] Add map client retry notification, Avi Kivity, 2009/01/18
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Direct memory access for devices, Blue Swirl, 2009/01/19