qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [6412] linux-user: add qemu_realloc() implementation to


From: Laurent Desnogues
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6412] linux-user: add qemu_realloc() implementation to unbreak the build ( Gerd Hoffman)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:38:34 +0100

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> Revision: 6412
>          http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=6412
> Author:   aliguori
> Date:     2009-01-23 15:02:20 +0000 (Fri, 23 Jan 2009)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> linux-user: add qemu_realloc() implementation to unbreak the build (Gerd 
> Hoffman)
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>    trunk/linux-user/mmap.c
>
> Modified: trunk/linux-user/mmap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/linux-user/mmap.c     2009-01-22 22:09:55 UTC (rev 6411)
> +++ trunk/linux-user/mmap.c     2009-01-23 15:02:20 UTC (rev 6412)
> @@ -123,6 +123,19 @@
>     munmap(p, *p);
>  }
>
> +void *qemu_realloc(void *ptr, size_t size)
> +{
> +    size_t old_size, copy;
> +    void *new_ptr;
> +
> +    old_size = *(size_t *)((char *)ptr - 16);
> +    copy = old_size < size ? old_size : size;
> +    new_ptr = qemu_malloc(size);
> +    memcpy(new_ptr, ptr, copy);
> +    qemu_free(ptr);
> +    return new_ptr;
> +}

Is it really the correct fix?  The original error comes from the fact
we compile qemu_iovec_* in cutils.c.  Do we really need these
iovec functions for user-mode?


Laurent




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]