[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:48:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) |
malc wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>>> Do you see the problem only on X11 remote?
>>>>> How bad is on vnc?
>>>>>
>>>> vnc regresses in exactly the same way.
>>>>
>> Well, in my experience both local X11 and VNC are fast in KVM-84.
>>
>> But remote X11/SDL performance plunged below usable levels.
>
> FWIW same thing happened to Mac OS X + SDL.
>
Are you talking about SDL local?
If so, is your host a big endian machine and the guest a little endian?
What is the color depth and bpp of the guest (I assume that the host is
32bpp)?
As usual two good tests are to check the vnc case and a guest in 32bpp too.
I tried to repeat the "tree C:\" test on qemu i386 but I couldn't see
any significant difference.
- [Qemu-devel] Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/15
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels,
Stefano Stabellini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20