qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix freezing bug in curses console


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix freezing bug in curses console
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:04:01 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)

andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/2/27 Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>:
Matthew Bloch wrote:
Hi there,

We are running lots of kvm processes in screen and found that about 1 in
5 froze shortly after startup startup with a backtrace like this one:

#0  0xf7c7fcd9 in pthread_exit () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0xf7cfbe62 in wresize () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
#2  0xf7cfb7ab in is_term_resized () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
#3  0xf7cfb877 in is_term_resized () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
#4  0xf7cfba31 in resize_term () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
#5  0x080d3dd9 in vga_init ()
#6  <signal handler called>
#7  0xf7c0da5b in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#8  0xf7c0effe in calloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#9  0xf7cf222e in newpad () from /lib/libncurses.so.5
#10 0x080d3549 in vga_init ()

We're just using the lenny version of kvm from 2008-12-16.

On casual inspection, the SIGWINCH signal handling looked ropey to me -
grandpa always told me not to do any real work in a signal handler, and
the backtrace suggested re-entrancy problems in curses, so I changed the
behaviour to set a flag and do the work in the main loop instead.  Maybe
I'm reading the backtrace wrong.

So far that means that when you resize the window, the display is
corrupt until the VM outputs some text, or the user hits a key.  But I
think it has solved the freezing / crashing bug too - would appreciate
any comments on my analysis or proposed solution.

It's racy with select().  A better fix would be to create a pipe and write
to that pipe in the SIGWINCH handler.  You should then register an io
callback using qemu_set_fd_handler2() that does the actions for SIGWINCH.

Maybe a bottom half would work?  The scheduling of a bh shouldn't
constitute "real work".

I think it still suffers from the same race condition so today it wouldn't work. You could fix the bottom half scheduling though so that you could safely schedule a bottom half from a signal handler (using roughly the same trick).

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to address@hidden
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]