[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_options table v3 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:15:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> >> This version uses a C tool to parse the options file instead of Perl
> >> script. I also added HXCOMM for comment purposes.
> >>
> >> Does this work on Windows?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure it doesn't work in cross environments.
>
> Just have qemu-user run the thing.
That's not going to work for several reasons:
- You might not be building qemu-user.
- qemu-user only supports a very small subset of systems. e.g. it's no use for
linux->windows cross builds, which I expect to be the most common case
- The necessary runtime libraries might not be installed. Even if they are,
qemu probably doesn't know where to find them.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_options table v3, Blue Swirl, 2009/03/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_options table v3, Paul Brook, 2009/03/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_options table v3, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_options table v3,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Syncing documentation vs. -help vs. qemu_options table v3, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/18
- [Qemu-devel] Random thought about qemu-user and Windows, Jamie Lokier, 2009/03/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Random thought about qemu-user and Windows, Johannes Schindelin, 2009/03/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Random thought about qemu-user and Windows, Stuart Brady, 2009/03/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Random thought about qemu-user and Windows, Andreas Färber, 2009/03/21