On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Juha Riihimäki
<address@hidden> wrote:
Any further comments? Or perhaps import the patch? I made a small
performance optimization in the new store_reg_bx macro by
performing the
simpler comparison first and the the little bit more expensive
comparison
only if the first comparison is true. At least I have encountered no
problems in OMAP2 and OMAP3 emulation so far; instead the guest
code which
doesn't run without the patch in OMAP3 now works.
I didn't take a close look at your patch, so I only have a cosmetic
comment :)
Wouldn't it be better to use a static inline function instead of a
macro for
store_reg_bx? At least I find it better looking and should not
degrade
performance.