Re: [Qemu-devel] [7118] linux-user: prefer glibc over direct syscalls

[Riku Voipio]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:25:25PM +0200, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> >  #if defined(TARGET_NR_inotify_rm_watch) && defined(__NR_inotify_rm_watch)
> > -_syscall2(int,sys_inotify_rm_watch,int,fd,uint32_t,wd)
> > +static int sys_inotify_rm_watch(int fd, int32_t wd)
> > +{
> > +  return (inotify_rm_watch(fd,pathname, wd));

> Isn't pathname spurious?

It is broken. Try this.

>From 448cfe737b614ec44a8c4a9a4d8c2542c3eac165 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Riku Voipio <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:38:14 +0300
Subject: linux-user: fix inotify syscalls

Configure test was broken, so the breakage of the #ifdef'd
code was not noticed.

Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <address@hidden>
---
 configure            |    2 +-
 linux-user/syscall.c |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 5b705a0..251d271 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ int
 main(void)
 {
        /* try to start inotify */
-       return inotify_init(void);
+       return inotify_init();
 }
 EOF
   if $cc $ARCH_CFLAGS -o $TMPE $TMPC 2> /dev/null ; then
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 898f58c..c94efe6 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ _syscall4(int,sys_utimensat,int,dirfd,const char *,pathname,
 #endif /* CONFIG_ATFILE */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_INOTIFY
+#include <sys/inotify.h>
 
 #if defined(TARGET_NR_inotify_init) && defined(__NR_inotify_init)
 static int sys_inotify_init(void)
@@ -496,7 +497,7 @@ static int sys_inotify_add_watch(int fd,const char 
*pathname, int32_t mask)
 #if defined(TARGET_NR_inotify_rm_watch) && defined(__NR_inotify_rm_watch)
 static int sys_inotify_rm_watch(int fd, int32_t wd)
 {
-  return (inotify_rm_watch(fd,pathname, wd));
+  return (inotify_rm_watch(fd, wd));
 }
 #endif
 #else
-- 
1.6.2.1


-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups