Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] Add module infrastructure toQEMU

[Avi Kivity]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > There's also the issue that shared libraries imply it's OK for third 
> > > parties to ship binary plugins.
> > >   
> >
> > Can't we add wording to LICENSE to address this?  I'd really like to 
> > allow GPL plugins.  Linux and now gcc allow this.
>
> There's a lot of technical work to actually support shared libraries 
> on all the platforms QEMU supports.  

We could enable that only on platforms that support it.

> Even if we had that, and I expect a big flame war wrt reinventing 
> autoconf here too, in order to realistically talk about plugins, we 
> would need a much more modular infrastructure than we have today to 
> allow a config file to specify a particular device without any core 
> knowledge in QEMU of that device.

No doubt.  But taking the first step may encourage people to work 
towards it.

> It's an admirable goal but we're far away from that.  When we 
> eventually get there, we still have the issue of stable ABI (and Linux 
> has this too).

That's fine, I think.  Not ideal but livable.


--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.