|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: autotest (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Qemu-commits] [COMMIT f80f9ec] Convert machine registration to use module initfunctions) |
Date: | Sun, 24 May 2009 14:46:42 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) |
Dor Laor wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:Glauber Costa wrote:We have such a frame work, it's the kvm autotest project - http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KVM-Autotest.How about we start sending patches to the list? Then this kind of thing can be avoided.It doesn't magically solve the problem. I post most patches and still regressions slip in. I review every patch I commit and still regressions slip in. People are imperfect.The best way to prevent regressions is to have an automated test suite that everyone can use to validate that a series of patches doesn't break things.
Autotest doesn't currently test the regressions that I want to test. But yeah, I agree with the general point that whatever we use as a regression suite ought to be drivable by autotest.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |