qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec-migration: handle EINTR in popen_get_buffe


From: Uri Lublin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec-migration: handle EINTR in popen_get_buffer()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:32:57 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2

On 06/08/2009 08:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 07:27:21PM +0300, Uri Lublin wrote:
Sometimes, upon interrupt, fread returns with no data, and
the (incoming exec) migration fails.

Fix by retrying on such a case.

Signed-off-by: Uri Lublin<address@hidden>
---
  savevm.c |    9 ++++++++-
  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c
index 248aea3..df2486d 100644
--- a/savevm.c
+++ b/savevm.c
@@ -215,7 +215,14 @@ static int popen_put_buffer(void *opaque, const uint8_t 
*buf, int64_t pos, int s
  static int popen_get_buffer(void *opaque, uint8_t *buf, int64_t pos, int size)
  {
      QEMUFilePopen *s = opaque;
-    return fread(buf, 1, size, s->popen_file);
+    FILE *fp = s->popen_file;
+    int bytes;
+
+    do {
+        clearerr(fp);

Would it make sense to only clearerr on EINTR - if we intend to retry?

I am not sure we should be worried about calling clearerr.
I guess we can clearerr only upon ferror()!=0.



+        bytes = fread(buf, 1, size, fp);
+    } while ((bytes == 0)&&  ferror(fp)&&  (errno == EINTR));


This does nothing about partial reads (bytes != 0)
I think it's intentional because the user actually retries
partial reads. Right?

It is intentional. The caller takes care of partial reads (lazily calling fill_buffer when needed).


+    return bytes;
  }

  static int popen_close(void *opaque)

Looking at qemu_fill_buffer, it seems that it is enough to set
bytes to -EAGAIN. User will then retry. Correct?


Currently qemu_fill_buffer does not retry (nor its callers).


Thanks for the review,
    Uri.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]