qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13]


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities]
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:26:33 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2

On 06/15/2009 06:20 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I would prefer explicit names (pci_addr, lun, etc.) but would be okay with generic names too.

I think having a generic address has a lot of value in terms of code implementation. Otherwise, the valid options for -drive become context-sensitive which is going to be annoying and error-prone. Some sanity could be added by using addressing prefixes like addr=pci:00:01.0 or addr=scsi:0.3 but I'll leave that up to whoever takes this on.

The code problems are easily solved by adding another level of indirection. User confusion problems are only aggravated by additional abstraction, though ("what do I put in addr=, here?").

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]