[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] State of sparc64-softmmu
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] State of sparc64-softmmu |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:47:44 +0300 |
On 6/23/09, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
>
> >
> > > But this leads me to wonder, is this just an oversite or is there
> > > something wrong with sparc64-softmmu that we don't recommend building it
> > > by default?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > My understanding it that there are still several large chunks remaining to
> be implemented, and it can not boot any real guest operating systems.
> >
> >
>
> If it's not building by default, it's going to bitrot (it already has).
Only for short periods, I frequently test it.
> So I'd suggest either making it build by default or removing it from the
> tree and moving it into a separate tree.
Ok, I'll enable it.